Ae. West et al., MULTIFLEX VERSUS SUPERELASTIC - A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL OF THE TOOTH ALIGNMENT ABILITY OF INITIAL ARCH WIRES, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics, 108(5), 1995, pp. 464-471
Two arch wires commonly used for initial tooth alignment were compared
with regard to their clinical effectiveness. The two arch wires teste
d were 0.0155-inch diameter multiple-stranded stainless steel wire (De
ntaflex, Dentaurium, Optident, Yorkshire, England) and 0.014-inch diam
eter nickel-titanium alloy wire (NiTi, ORMCO Co., Monrovia, Calif.). C
onsecutive patients attending an orthodontic clinic for routine placem
ent of a fixed appliance were randomly assigned one of these two initi
al arch wires. Good quality alginate impressions of the appropriate de
ntal arch were taken before arch wire placement and also at the subseq
uent appointment, which was, on average, 6 weeks later. Seventy-four a
rches were used in this study. The degree of tooth alignment achieved
for each wire type was compared with a Reflex Microscope (Reflex Measu
rement Ltd., Butleigh, England) to make detailed measurements on the r
esultant casts. The degree of initial alignment achieved with the two
wires was similar over this g-week period. However, some differences w
ere found for the lower labial segment where the interbracket span is
usually reduced and where the superelastic nickel-titanium wire was fo
und to give improved alignment. No threshold of crowding was found whe
re one arch wire performed better than the other.