C. Gemel et al., OXIDATION OF RUTHENIUM(II) TO RUTHENIUM(IV) ETA(4)-DIENE COMPLEXES - SWING MECHANISM AND DIENE-ALLYL CONVERSION, Organometallics, 16(3), 1997, pp. 427-433
This paper reports on the synthesis and reactivity of Ru(IV) eta(4)-di
ene complexes of the type Ru(eta(5)-C(5)Me(5))(eta(4)-diene)Br-2(+) ob
tained by oxidative bromine additions to Ru(II) eta(4)-diene complexes
. Mechanistic details are derived from the reaction products varying w
ith the oxidizing agent and the leaving ligand and are backed up by ex
tended Huckel molecular orbital calculations. The diene fragment in Ru
(IV) is prone to gauche deformation and is therefore extremely suscept
ible to nucleophilic attack of even weak anionic bases generating the
corresponding Ru(IV) eta(3)-allyl complexes. Accordingly, Ru(IV) eta(4
)-diene complexes are stabilized either by using 2,3-disubstituted die
ne ligands in which case gauche deformation is highly unfavorable or e
lse by excluding nucleophilic agents. For the latter method, two conve
nient routes to affording Ru(IV) eta(4)-diene complexes are (i) the re
action of Br+CF3SO3- with Ru(eta(5)-C(5)Me(5))(eta(4)-diene)Br and (ii
) the reaction of dibromine with labile Ru(eta(5)-C(5)Me(5))(eta(4)-di
ene)(CF3SO3). The conversion of the Ru(II) eta(4)-diene to the Ru(IV)
eta(4)-diene complex is suggested to proceed via a swing of the diene
ligand by changing the dihedral angle between the C(5)Me(5) and diene
ligands from about +20 to about -70 degrees concomitantly pushing the
leaving ligand (Br- or CF3SO3-) out.