ALLOGENIC BONE-MARROW TRANSPLANTATION FOR CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA IN CHILDHOOD - A REPORT FROM THE EUROPEAN WORKING GROUP ON MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROME IN CHILDHOOD
F. Locatelli et al., ALLOGENIC BONE-MARROW TRANSPLANTATION FOR CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA IN CHILDHOOD - A REPORT FROM THE EUROPEAN WORKING GROUP ON MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROME IN CHILDHOOD, Journal of clinical oncology, 15(2), 1997, pp. 566-573
Purpose: To evaluate the role of allogeneic bone marrow transplantatio
n (BMT) in children with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). Patie
nts and Methods: Forty-three children with CMML given BMT and reported
to the European Working Group on Myelodysplastic Syndrome in Childhoo
d (EWOG-MDS) data bose were evaluated. in 25 cases, the donor was a hu
man leukocyte antigen (HLA)-identical or a one-antigen-disparate relat
ive, in four cases a mismatched family donor, and in 14 a matched unre
lated donor (MUD). Conditioning regimens consisted of total-body irrad
iation (TBI) and chemotherapy in 22 patients, whereas busulfan (Bu) wi
th other cytotoxic drugs was used in the remaining patients. Results:
Six of 43 patients (14%), five of wham received transplants from alter
native donors, failed to engraft. There was a significant difference i
n the incidences of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) between c
hildren transplanted from compatible/one-antigen-mismatched relatives
and from alternative donors (23% and 87%, respectively; P < .005). Pro
babilities of transplant-related mortality for children given BMT from
HLA-identical/one-antigen-disparate relatives or from MUD/mismatched
relatives were 9% and 46%, respectively. The probability of relapse fo
r the entire group was 58%, whereas the 5-year event-free survival (EF
S) rate was 31%. The EFS rate for children given BMT from an HLA-ident
ical sibling or one-antigen-disparate relative was 38%. In this latter
group, patients who received Bu had a better EFS compared with those
given TBI (62% v 11%, P < .01). Conclusion: Children with CMML and on
HLA-compatible relative should be transplanted as early as possible. I
mprovement of donor selection, GVHD prophylaxis, and supportive care o
re needed to ameliorate results of BMT from alternative donors. (C) 19
97 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.