REPETITIVE CYCLES OF CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE, THIOTEPA, AND CARBOPLATIN INTENSIFICATION WITH PERIPHERAL-BLOOD PROGENITOR CELLS AND FILGRASTIM IN ADVANCED BREAST-CANCER PATIENTS
Cl. Shapiro et al., REPETITIVE CYCLES OF CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE, THIOTEPA, AND CARBOPLATIN INTENSIFICATION WITH PERIPHERAL-BLOOD PROGENITOR CELLS AND FILGRASTIM IN ADVANCED BREAST-CANCER PATIENTS, Journal of clinical oncology, 15(2), 1997, pp. 674-683
Purpose: As an alternative to single-cycle cyclophosphamide, thiotepa,
and carboplatin (CTCb) intensification, we evaluated the feasibility
of administering one-quarter dose CTCb for four cycles with peripheral
-blood progenitor-cell (PBPC) end filgrastim (granulocyte colony-stimu
lating factor [G-CSF]) in advanced-stage breast cancer patients. Patie
nts and Methods: From June 1992 to August 1993, 20 stage IIIB (n = 7)
and IV (9 = 13) breast cancer patients received 78 cycles of induction
with doxorubicin 90 mg/m(2) by intravenous (IV) bolus with G-CSF 5 mu
g/kg/d by subcutaneous injection (SC) repeated every 14 to 21 days fo
r four cycles. PBPC were collected by 2-hour single-blood volume leuka
pheresis on 2 consecutive days at the time of hematologic recovery fro
m each cycle of doxorubicin. Eighteen patients received 61 cycles of i
ntensification with cyclophosphamide 1,500 mg/m(2), thiotepa 125 mg/m(
2), and carboplatin 200 mg/m(2) by IV continuous infusion with G-CSF 1
0 mu g/kg/d SC and PBPC support repeated every 21 to 42 days for four
cycles. Results: Twelve of 20 patients (60%) completed all four planne
d cycles of daxorubicin induction followed by four cycles of one-quart
er dose CTCb intensification. Statistically significantly decreases in
the yield of mononuclear cells (MNC) (median slope per day, -0.032; P
= .03), granulocyte-macrophcIge colony-forming unit (CFU-GM) (median
slope per day, -0.57; P = .0008), and burst-forming unit-erythroid (BF
U-E) (median slope per day, -1.18; P = .006) were observed over the co
urse of the eight leukaphereses. Of 18 patients who began CTCb, 12 (67
%) completed four cycles. Six patients were removed from study during
intensification: two for progressive disease (PD), one refused further
treatment, and three for dose-limiting hematologic toxicity. A fourth
patient fulfilled the criteria for dose-limiting hematologic toxicity
after cycle 4. The toxicity of the multiple cycle CTCb intensificatio
n regimen consisted of grade IV leukopenia, grade IV thrombocytopenia,
and febrile neutropenia in 100%, l00%, and 26% of cycles, respectivel
y. The median duration of each CTCb cycle was 24 days (range, 18 to 63
), and the median duration of an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) less
than or equal to 500/mu L and platelet count less than or equal to 20,
000/mu L during each cycle was 6 days (range, 2 to 15) and 4 days (ran
ge, 0 to 38), respectively. Conclusion: It is feasible to administer r
epetitive cycles of one-quarter dose CTCb intensification with PBPC an
d G-CSF. Additional studies are required to determine whether multiple
cycles of CTCb intensification might offer a therapeutic advantage ov
er a single high-dose cycle. (C) 1997 by American Society of Clinical
Oncology.