COMPARISON OF RECTAL TO INTRANASAL ADMINISTRATION OF MIDAZOLAM FOR PREMEDICATION OF CHILDREN

Citation
V. Khazin et al., COMPARISON OF RECTAL TO INTRANASAL ADMINISTRATION OF MIDAZOLAM FOR PREMEDICATION OF CHILDREN, Military medicine, 160(11), 1995, pp. 579-581
Citations number
NO
Categorie Soggetti
Medicine Miscellaneus
Journal title
ISSN journal
00264075
Volume
160
Issue
11
Year of publication
1995
Pages
579 - 581
Database
ISI
SICI code
0026-4075(1995)160:11<579:CORTIA>2.0.ZU;2-T
Abstract
Sixty children aged 3 to 9, undergoing minor surgical procedures, were studied to compare 0.5 mg/kg intranasal with 0.5 mg/kg rectal midazol am as a premedication. The children were evaluated for their ability t o tolerate the medication, preanesthestic sedation, and alertness afte r anesthesia, Both premedication routes were equally effective in seda ting the children. In both groups, a significant loss of effectiveness was noted if induction of the anesthesia began more than 30 minutes a fter administration of the medication (p < 0.0003). Rectal midazolam w as much better tolerated by the children than the intranasal route (30 versus 3, p < 0.0001), We advocate the rectal over the intranasal rou te for premedication with midazolam in children, and anesthestic induc tion should occur no more than 30 minutes after administration of prem edication.