Gj. Matthews et al., PATENCY FOLLOWING MICROSURGICAL VASOEPIDIDYMOSTOMY AND VASOVASOSTOMY - TEMPORAL CONSIDERATIONS, The Journal of urology, 154(6), 1995, pp. 2070-2073
Purpose: We evaluate the temporal parameters of patency following vaso
epididymostomy and vasovasostomy. Materials and Methods: A series of c
onsecutive and concurrent vasoepididymostomies (100) and vasovasostomi
es (100) performed by a single surgeon (M. G.) was reviewed. Results:
Patency rates following vasoepididymostomy and vasovasostomy were 65%
and 99%, respectively (p < 0.001). Motile sperm were observed at a mea
n of 5.8 +/- 0.8 months (standard error) following vasoepididymostomy
and 2.1 +/- 0.2 months following vasovasostomy (p < 0.01). Late failur
e rates were 21% for vasoepididymostomy and 12% for vasovasostomy. Pre
gnancy rates following vasoepididymostomy and vasovasostomy were 21% a
nd 52%, respectively. Conclusions: Patency is rapid following vasovaso
stomy but requires 12 or more months following vasoepididymostomy. Int
ervention for azoospermia is appropriate 6 months after vasovasostomy
and 1 year after vasoepididymostomy. Intraoperative cryopreservation o
f sperm in men undergoing vasoepididymostomy and postoperatively in al
l men with motile sperm will maximize fertility options.