Rg. Middleton et al., PROSTATE-CANCER CLINICAL GUIDELINES PANEL SUMMARY REPORT ON THE MANAGEMENT OF CLINICALLY LOCALIZED PROSTATE-CANCER, The Journal of urology, 154(6), 1995, pp. 2144-2148
Purpose: The American Urological Association convened the Prostate Can
cer Clinical Guidelines Panel to analyze the literature regarding avai
lable methods for treating locally confined prostate cancer, and to ma
ke practice policy recommendations based on the treatment outcomes dat
a insofar as the data permit. Materials and Methods: The panel searche
d the MEDLINE data base for all articles from 1966 to 1993 on stage T2
(B) prostate cancer and systematically analyzed outcomes data for rad
ical prostatectomy, radiation therapy and surveillance as treatment al
ternatives. Outcomes considered most important were survival at 5, 10
and 15 years, progression at 5, 10 and 15 years, and treatment complic
ations. Results: The panel found the outcomes data inadequate for vali
d comparisons of treatments. Differences were too great among treatmen
t series with regard to such significant characteristics as age, tumor
grade and pelvic lymph node status. The panel elected to display, in
tabular form and graphically, the ranges in outcomes data reported for
each treatment alternative. Conclusions: In making its recommendation
s, the panel presented treatment alternatives as options, identifying
the advantages and disadvantages of each, and recommended as a standar
d that patients with newly diagnosed, clinically localized prostate ca
ncer should be informed of all commonly accepted treatment options.