CHANGES IN THE DRY-MATTER, SUGAR, PLANT FIBER AND LIGNIN CONTENTS OF SWEDE, RAPE AND KALE ROOTS IN RESPONSE TO TURNIP ROOT FLY (DELIA-FLORALIS) LARVAL DAMAGE
Rj. Hopkins et al., CHANGES IN THE DRY-MATTER, SUGAR, PLANT FIBER AND LIGNIN CONTENTS OF SWEDE, RAPE AND KALE ROOTS IN RESPONSE TO TURNIP ROOT FLY (DELIA-FLORALIS) LARVAL DAMAGE, Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 69(3), 1995, pp. 321-328
Plants from two genotypes of swede (Brassica napus var napobrassica),
kale (B oleracea var. acephala) and rape (B napus var napus) were each
inoculated at the three to four true leaf stage with 10 eggs of the t
urnip root fly, Delia floralis. After 8 weeks the damage caused by the
resultant larvae significantly reduced the weight of leaves, stems an
d roots compared with uninoculated plants, with the greatest reduction
(26-46%) being found in the roots. Dry matter content, which did not
differ between either crop type or cultivar, was unaffected by larval
damage. Ethanol-soluble sugar content was reduced in all cases by larv
al damage, but only significantly in one rape and one swede cultivar.
The effect of D floralis damage on the concentrations of individual su
gars (glucose, fructose and sucrose) was crop type and cultivar depend
ent. The neutral detergent fibre and lignin contents of the undamaged
swede roots were significantly lower than in either the undamaged kale
or rape cultivars studied. In all crop types the neutral detergent fi
bre and lignin content significantly increased following D floralis da
mage. The six Brassica genotypes studied fell into two groups on the b
asis of host status for D floralis. The two kale cultivars and the for
age rape Hobson were considered poor hosts for D floralis, with low pe
rcentage pupation (38-41%) and low pupae weight (12.5-14.4 mg). The tw
o swedes and the oilseed rape Ariana were considered good host for D f
loralis, with both higher percentage pupation (51-59%) and pupae weigh
ts (19.8-20.0 mg). The possible relationships between the root composi
tion of undamaged and attacked roots, and D floralis resistance are di
scussed.