Jm. Blondeau et al., EVALUATION OF AEROBIC BACTEC-6A NON-RESIN-CONTAINING AND BACTEC-16A RESIN-CONTAINING MEDIA FOR THE RECOVERY OF MICROORGANISMS CAUSING PERITONITIS, Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease, 22(4), 1995, pp. 361-368
Recovery of microorganisms causing peritonitis in patients on continuo
us ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) continues to be problematic.
To date, there is no universally accepted protocol. We prospectively a
nalyzed 430 peritoneal effluent specimens by three protocols: (a) 3 ml
of effluent was centrifuged and the pellet plated onto blood and MacC
onkey agars and into thioglycolate broth (routine method), (b) 3 ml of
each was inoculated at the bedside into BACTEC 6A aerobic and 16A aer
obic resin-containing media, and (c) 3 ml of each was inoculated in th
e laboratory into BACTEC 6A and 16A media. Of the peritoneal effluent
specimens, 104 (24%) had microorganisms recovered; 63 were positive by
the routine method compared with 86 (P <.001) by bedside-inoculated 1
6A. Bedside-inoculated 16A (86) recovered more microorganisms than bed
side-inoculated 6A (70) (P <.05). Laboratory-inoculated 16A (86) recov
ered more organisms than the routine method (63) (P <.05). Of 42 posit
ive peritoneal effluent specimens delayed in transit greater than or e
qual to 1 day, 23 were positive by the routine method compared with 34
bedside inoculated 16A (P <.01) and 30 laboratory-inoculated 16A (P >
.114). Bedside-inoculated 16A media is superior to the routine method
for the recovery of microorganisms causing peritonitis in CAPD patient
s.