Ks. Mcdonald et Rh. Fitts, EFFECT OF HINDLIMB UNLOADING ON RAT SOLEUS FIBER FORCE, STIFFNESS, AND CALCIUM SENSITIVITY, Journal of applied physiology, 79(5), 1995, pp. 1796-1802
The purpose of this study was to examine the time course of change in
soleus muscle fiber peak force (N), tension (P-o, KN/m(2)), elastic mo
dulus (E(o)), and force-pCa and stiffness-pCa relationships. After 1,
2, or 3 wk of hindlimb unloading (HU), single fibers were isolated and
placed between a motor arm and a transducer, and fiber diameter, peak
absolute force, Po-,Po- E(o), and force-pCa and stiffness-pCa relatio
nships were characterized. One week of HU resulted in a significant re
duction in fiber diameter (68 +/- 2 vs. 57 +/- 1 mu m), force (3.59 +/
- 0.15 vs. 2.19 +/- 0.12 x 10(-4) N), P-o (102 +/- 4 vs. 85 +/- 2 kN/
m(2)), and E(o) (1.96 +/- 0.12 vs. 1.37 +/- 0.13 x 10(7) N/m(2)), and
2 wk of HU caused a further decline in fiber diameter (45 +/- 1 mu m),
force (1.31 +/- 0.06 x 10(-4) N), and E(o) (0.96 +/- 0.09 x 10(7) N/m
(2)). Although the mean fiber diameter and absolute force continued to
decline through 3 wk of HU, P-o recovered to values not significantly
different from control. The P-o/E(o) ratio was significantly increase
d after 1 (5.5 +/- 0.3 to 7.1 +/- 0.6), 2, and 3 wk of HU, and the 2-w
k (9.5 +/- 0.4) and 3-wk (9.4 +/- 0.8) values were significantly great
er than the 1-wk values. The force-pCa and stiffness-pCa curves were s
hifted rightward after 1, 2, and 3 wk of HU. At 1 wk of HU, the Ca2+ s
ensitivity of isometric force, assessed by Ca2+ concentration required
for half-maximal force, was increased from the control value of 1.83
+/- 0.12 to 2.30 +/- 0.10 mu M. In conclusion, after HU, the decrease
in soleus fiber P-o can be explained by a reduction in the number of m
yofibrillar cross bridges per cross-sectional area. Our working hypoth
esis is that the loss of contractile protein reduces the number of cro
ss bridges per cross-sectional area and increases the filament lattice
spacing. The increased spacing reduces cross-bridge force and stiffne
ss, but P-o/E(o) increases because of a quantitatively greater effect
on stiffness.