We examined the consistency of apnoea recognition between three human
experts. The hypothesis was that computer detection of apnoea could em
ulate human expert apnoea recognition. The aim was to detect apnoeas w
ith the highest possible accuracy from a single breathing signal, by b
oth human experts and computer. Three human experts independently exam
ined recordings of breathing waveform from overnight sleep studies fro
m 10 infants aged 3-17 weeks. All apnoeas of 5 s or more were identifi
ed and reviewed. However, there still remained 10% disagreement. A com
puter apnoea detector was implemented. An algorithm analysed statistic
al properties of the signal to find breathing pauses. Optimal performa
nce was 1% missed apnoeas (compared with the agreed apnoeas identified
by the three experts) and 29% false detections. This computer algorit
hm reliably identified most apnoeas but did not replace the human expe
rt.