A COMPARISON OF THE COSTS OF AND QUALITY-OF-LIFE AFTER CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY OR CORONARY SURGERY FOR MULTIVESSEL CORONARY-ARTERY DISEASE - RESULTS FROM THE EMERY ANGIOPLASTY VERSUS SURGERY TRIAL (EAST)
Ws. Weintraub et al., A COMPARISON OF THE COSTS OF AND QUALITY-OF-LIFE AFTER CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY OR CORONARY SURGERY FOR MULTIVESSEL CORONARY-ARTERY DISEASE - RESULTS FROM THE EMERY ANGIOPLASTY VERSUS SURGERY TRIAL (EAST), Circulation, 92(10), 1995, pp. 2831-2840
Background The Emery Angioplasty Versus Surgery Trial (EAST) is a rand
omized trial that compares, by intention to treat, the clinical outcom
e and costs of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) a
nd coronary surgery for multivessel coronary artery disease. Methods a
nd Results The primary end point was a composite of death, Q-wave myoc
ardial infarction, and a large reversible thallium defect at 3 years.
Multiple measures of quality of life also were made. Charges were asse
ssed from the hospital UB-82 bills; professional charges were assessed
from the Emery Clinic. Hospital charges were reduced to cost through
step-down accounting methods. All costs and charges were deflated to 1
987 dollars. Costs were assessed for the initial hospitalization and t
he cumulative costs of the initial hospitalization and additional reva
scularization procedures for up to 3 years. There was no difference in
mortality or the primary end point. Mean initial hospital charges wer
e $12 654 for the PTCA group and $20 214 for the surgery group (P<.000
1). Professional charges were $4538 for PTCA and $9426 for surgery (P<
.0001). Three-year hospital charges were $19 047 for PTCA and $21 174
for coronary surgery (P<.0001). Three-year professional charges were $
6412 for PTCA and $9861 for surgery (P<.0001). Three-year total charge
s were $25 458 for PTCA and $31 033 for surgery (P<.0001). Total 3-yea
r costs were $23 734 for PTCA and $25 310 for coronary surgery (P<.000
1). There were more hospitalizations for angina and more antianginal m
edications used in the PTCA group, which would further narrow the diff
erences in cost. Conclusions There was no difference in the primary en
d point or its components at 3 years. Although the primary procedural
costs of coronary surgery are more than for coronary angioplasty, this
cost advantage is largely, although probably not completely, lost by
3 years because of more frequent additional procedures and other resou
rce consumption after a first revascularization by PTCA.