COMPARISON OF MYOCARDIAL CONTRAST ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY AND LOW-DOSE DOBUTAMINE STRESS ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY IN PREDICTING RECOVERY OF LEFT-VENTRICULAR FUNCTION AFTER CORONARY REVASCULARIZATION IN CHRONIC ISCHEMIC-HEART-DISEASE
Cr. Defilippi et al., COMPARISON OF MYOCARDIAL CONTRAST ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY AND LOW-DOSE DOBUTAMINE STRESS ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY IN PREDICTING RECOVERY OF LEFT-VENTRICULAR FUNCTION AFTER CORONARY REVASCULARIZATION IN CHRONIC ISCHEMIC-HEART-DISEASE, Circulation, 92(10), 1995, pp. 2863-2868
Background Dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) and myocardial con
trast echocardiography (MCE) can predict recovery of left ventricular
function after myocardial infarction. DSE also has been shown to predi
ct left ventricular functional recovery after revascularization in chr
onic ischemic heart disease, whereas MCE has not been evaluated in suc
h patients. This study was performed to compare DSE and MCE in the pre
diction of left ventricular functional recovery after revascularizatio
n in patients with chronic ischemic heart disease. Methods and Results
MCE and DSE were performed in 35 patients with chronic coronary arter
y disease and significant wall motion abnormalities (mean ejection fra
ction, 0.36+/-0.09). Regional wall motion was scored by use of a 16-se
gment model wherein 1=normal or hyperkinetic, 2=hypokinetic, 3=akineti
c, and 4=dyskinetic. Each segment was evaluated for contractile reserv
e by DSE and perfusion by MCE. Revascularization (coronary artery bypa
ss graft [n=13] and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty [n=
10]) was successful in 23 patients. Follow-up echocardiograms were don
e to assess wall motion 30 to 60 days later. In 238 segments with rest
ing wall motion abnormalities, perfusion was more likely to present th
an contractile reserve (97% versus 91%, P<.02). Revascularization resu
lted in functional recovery in 77 of 95 hypokinetic segments (81%) but
only 18 of 57 akinetic segments (32%, P<.0001). DSE and MCE were not
significantly different in predicting functional recovery of hypokinet
ic segments. In akinetic segments, DSE and MCE had similar sensitiviti
es (89% versus 94%, respectively) and negative predictive values (93%
and 97%, respectively) in predicting functional recovery. However, DSE
had a higher specificity (92% versus 67%, P<.02) and positive predict
ive value (85% versus 55%, P<.02) than MCE in predicting functional re
covery. Conclusions Both contractile reserve by DSE and perfusion by M
CE are predictive of functional recovery in hypokinetic segments after
coronary revascularization in patients with chronic coronary artery d
isease. In akinetic segments, myocardial perfusion by MCE may exist in
segments that do not recover contractile function after revasculariza
tion. Thus, contractile reserve during low-dose dobutamine infusion is
a better predictor of functional recovery after revascularization in
akinetic segments than perfusion.