Adj. Watson et Db. Church, PREFERENCES OF VETERINARIANS FOR DRUGS TO TREAT HEART-DISEASE IN DOGSAND CATS, Australian Veterinary Journal, 72(11), 1995, pp. 401-403
Responses (473) were collated from a questionnaire sent to 5054 veteri
narians in Australia enquiring about drug preferences for treating car
diac disease in dogs and cats. When treating a small breed dog with en
docardiosis and mild left congestive heart failure, 74% of 472 respond
ents used a diuretic, 67% a theophylline derivative, 27% a vasodilator
and 20% a positive inotrope. Frusemide was the preferred diuretic and
digoxin the preferred inotrope, but vasodilator use varied. Low sodiu
m diets were ''often recommended'' by 71% of respondents, Propranolol
was preferred to diltiazem for treating feline hypertrophic cardiomyop
athy. Digoxin was clearly preferred for treating supraventricular dysr
hythmias, while lignocaine and digoxin were preferred equally for vent
ricular dysrhythmias. Respondents appeared more willing than US veteri
narians to use theophylline derivatives and prasozin, and less incline
d to employ nitrates, hydralazine, inotropes other than digoxin, and l
ow sodium diets.