In a post hoc analysis of prior nicotine patch studies, we analysed fi
ndings in 357 subjects (43 recovering alcoholics, 314 non-alcoholics)
to determine if recovering alcoholic smokers were more nicotine depend
ent than non-alcoholics and whether the efficacy of nicotine patch the
rapy was comparable. The Self-Administered Alcoholism Screening Test w
as used to identify recovering alcoholics. Recovering alcoholics had s
ignificantly higher mean smoking rates (cigarettes per day), Fagerstro
m scores and baseline serum nicotine and cotinine than non-alcoholics.
Among a subset of 240 subjects with a comparable treatment protocol,
smoking cessation rates at the end of nicotine patch therapy were simi
lar in recovering alcoholics (46%) and non-alcoholics (47%) receiving
active 22 mg patches bur higher than the respective placebo groups (17
% and 19%). The 1-year rate was significantly (p = 0.005) higher in th
e non-alcoholic group assigned to an active patch (31%) compared to pl
acebo (14%). For recovering alcoholics, the rates were lower and not s
ignificantly different (active 0%, placebo 11%). Recovering alcoholic
smokers are likely to be more nicotine dependent than non-alcoholic sm
okers but can achieve comparable short-term cessation rates with nicot
ine parch therapy. Use of an objective, validated measure of alcohol d
ependence is indicated in clinical trials when it is desirable to know
whether the subjects are active or recovering alcoholics.