VARIABILITY IN BPRS DEFINITIONS OF POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE SYMPTOMS

Citation
Ir. Nicholson et al., VARIABILITY IN BPRS DEFINITIONS OF POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE SYMPTOMS, Schizophrenia research, 17(2), 1995, pp. 177-185
Citations number
59
Categorie Soggetti
Psychiatry,"Clinical Neurology",Psychiatry,"Clinical Neurology
Journal title
ISSN journal
09209964
Volume
17
Issue
2
Year of publication
1995
Pages
177 - 185
Database
ISI
SICI code
0920-9964(1995)17:2<177:VIBDOP>2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
Reviewing Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) research indicates tha t combining items to form larger 'symptom factors' (e.g., depression, psychosis) has become the standard methodology. Unfortunately, a singl e symptom factor may be defined by different combinations of different BPRS items in different studies. To examine the potential impact of t hese differences, a number of different BPRS definitions of positive a nd negative symptoms in schizophrenia were culled from previous resear ch. To compare these definitions, one hundred schizophrenics were inte rviewed with regard to current and recent symptomatology and rated on the BPRS, the Schedule for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS), and the Schedule for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS). The four BPRS negative symptom definitions all correlated highly with one another and with the SANS. There were no differences in the amount tha t these different definitions of negative symptoms correlated with the SANS. Also, the nine definitions of positive symptoms all correlated highly with one another and with the SAPS. However, there were signifi cant differences in how they correlated with the SAPS. Because of thes e differences, possible standard definitions for negative and positive symptoms of schizophrenia are proposed for future use of the BPRS in research.