Ap. Hoover et Ma. Shannon, BUILDING GREENWAY POLICIES WITHIN A PARTICIPATORY DEMOCRACY FRAMEWORK, Landscape and urban planning, 33(1-3), 1995, pp. 433-459
Institutional arrangements which promote collaborative policy outcomes
are critical to greenway protection within a participatory democracy
framework. An example of greenway protection at the local level where
coordinated land use policy efforts are under way is investigated to d
emonstrate how various kinds of existing cooperative arrangements betw
een communities and governments may facilitate greenway protection. Pe
rsonal interviews are conducted with three groups of greenway policy p
articipants in the Tug Hill region of upstate New York. The objectives
of this study are to (1) identify and describe available opportunitie
s for collaboration, and (2) describe the implications of these opport
unities in terms of their contribution to the development of greenway
policies in a participatory democracy context. The case study findings
show that opportunities for cooperative discourse are described by al
l three groups as specific roles played by individuals, or as objects,
occasions, processes, or organizations which encourage talk about pub
lic issues among citizens and people representing different organizati
ons. A large portion of the opportunities described by study participa
nts are organizations which function as communication linkages, and to
a lesser extent, roles assumed by individuals in the community or soc
iety. Opportunities for discussion of public issues tend to be describ
ed by the three groups in terms of two organizational attributes: auth
ority level and degree of formality. Cooperative discourse occurs betw
een study participants and five different levels of authority: federal
, state, local, private, and citizen. Although each group can identify
formal-impersonal linkages with most other levels of authority, a por
tion of the study participants prefer to rely on informal-personal lin
kages when discussing public issues with local governments and landown
ers. Linkages described by study participants encourage either simple
or complex forms of public deliberation, with the former being more co
mmon. Simple forms are superficial communicative exchanges about publi
c issues between citizens and private or public organizations. More co
mplex forms are closely aligned with theoretical definitions of partic
ipatory democracy, where policy participants come to a shared understa
nding during the course of policy deliberation. The potential for buil
ding greenway policies in a participatory democracy context by focusin
g on local authority levels and informal-personal linkages among relev
ant organizations is discussed.