T. Martine et al., ACCURACY OF ANTHROPOMETRIC ESTIMATION OF MUSCLE CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA OF THE ARM IN MALES, American journal of human biology, 9(1), 1997, pp. 73-86
Mid-arm cross-sectional muscle area was studied in several domains to
evaluate nutritional status and muscle area and hypertrophy in revalid
ation and strength-related studies. In this study, anthropometrically
determined muscle + bone area formulas were validated against Houndsfi
eld unit-based CT-scan measures at mid-humerus (stretched and relaxed)
, and mid-humerus -3 and -6 cm positions in 75 healthy male twins. Mus
cle + bone area estimates calculated by mid-arm circumference and the
triceps skinfold (MBA.ANg, MBA.ANh) underestimated muscle area determi
ned by CT imaging (MUS.CT) at all scans. The formula, including tricep
s and biceps skinfold (MBA.ANf), was in closer agreement with MUS.CT.
It is therefore suggested that both the biceps and triceps skinfolds (
or additional arm skinfolds) be used to estimate muscle area at the mi
d-arm position. The results emphasize the use of(nonremovable) landmar
ks in longitudinal studies that consider mid-arm muscle cross-sectiona
l area, since the muscle area in three scans over a 6 cm region of the
upper arm differs substantially and is in the same range as expected
hypertrophic changes after short-term resistance training programs. (C
) 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.