M. Nakayama et al., TEFLON VOCAL FOLD AUGMENTATION - FAILURES AND MANAGEMENT IN 28 CASES, Otolaryngology and head and neck surgery, 109(3), 1993, pp. 493-498
Although vocal fold augmentation by Teflon injection has been the main
stay of treatment for glottic insufficiency for three decades, the suc
cess and safety of this treatment have been overstated. Twenty-eight p
atients who manifested poor or complicated Teflon results between 1984
and 1991 were evaluated using acoustic, aerodynamic, videostroboscopi
c, perceptual, and subjective patient self-evaluation of voice, both b
efore and after our management of these complications. Most of these h
ad Teflon granulomas; subglottic overfilling was the most common condi
tion. In most instances such management included microsurgical removal
of the Teflon granuloma. Voice measures that were abnormal before cor
rection tended to improve and move into the normal range, although the
resultant voices were not totally normal. Degree of improvement varie
d depending on the Teflon-induced tissue changes and the methods of co
rrection subsequently used. The worst results were in patients with sc
arring, atrophy, and bilaterally mobile vocal folds, for whom Teflon s
hould never have been injected. Teflon injection should be reserved fo
r those instances in which it is clearly indicated and the surgeon is
skilled in the technique of intrafold injection.