Mg. Turner et al., A REVISED CONCEPT OF LANDSCAPE EQUILIBRIUM - DISTURBANCE AND STABILITY ON SCALED LANDSCAPES, Landscape ecology, 8(3), 1993, pp. 213-227
Temporal and spatial scales of disturbance and recovery are often conf
ounded in discussions of landscape equilibrium. We developed a broad f
ramework for the description of landscapes that separates the spatial
and temporal scales of disturbance and recovery and predicts the resul
tant dynamics of a landscape. Two key parameters representing time and
space are used to describe potential disturbance dynamics. The tempor
al parameter, T, is the ratio of the disturbance interval (i.e., time
between successive disturbance events) to the time required for a dist
urbed site to recover to a mature stage. The spatial parameter, S, is
the ratio of the size of the disturbance to the size of the landscape.
The use of ratios in both parameters permits the comparison of landsc
apes across a range of spatial and temporal scales. A simple simulatio
n model was developed to explore the implications of various combinati
ons of S and T. For any single simulation, disturbances of a fixed siz
e are imposed at random locations on a gridded landscape at specified
intervals. Disturbed sites recover deterministically through successio
n. Where disturbance interval is long relative to recovery time and a
small proportion of the landscape is affected, the system is stable an
d exhibits low variance over time (e.g., northeastern hardwood forests
). These are traditional ''equilibrium'' systems. Where disturbance in
terval is comparable to recovery interval and a large proportion of th
e landscape is affected, the system is stable but exhibits large varia
nce (e.g., subalpine forests in Yellowstone Park). Where disturbance i
nterval becomes much shorter than recovery time and a large proportion
of the landscape is affected, the system may become unstable and shif
t into a different trajectory (e.g., arid ecosystems with altered fire
regimes). This framework permits the prediction of disturbance condit
ions that lead to qualitatively different landscape dynamics and demon
strates the scale-dependent nature of concepts of landscape equilibriu
m.