Colonoscopic surveillance after resection for colorectal cancer has be
en advocated to improve detection of anastomotic recurrence, and of sy
nchronous and metachronous tumours. The benefit provided by colonoscop
y remains unproven, and the best timing of examination is unclear. To
determine the value of colonoscopy after curative resection for large
bowel cancer, the efficacy of an endoscopic surveillance programme in
the early detection of intraluminal bowel recurrence in a series of pa
tients admitted with colorectal cancer was examined. Between April 198
3 and December 1988, 132 patients underwent colonoscopy. Eight (6.1 pe
r cent) were found to have intraluminal recurrence without evidence of
extraluminal spread. Six of these recurrences were at the site of ana
stomosis and two represented metachronous tumour development. All of t
hese patients were symptomatic at the time of diagnosis. In 15 patient
s (11.4 per cent), adenomatous polyps were discovered during the initi
al endoscopic examination. These results indicate that colonoscopic su
rveillance will rarely allow early detection of asymptomatic intralumi
nal bowel recurrence, but is valuable in the detection of synchronous
lesions. Frequent surveillance is not justified in the early postopera
tive years and colonoscopy should probably be confined to a single pro
cedure to exclude synchronous lesions.