G. Choudhuri et al., IS DUODENAL BILE REPRESENTATIVE OF GALLBLADDER BILE - A COMPARATIVE-STUDY, Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology, 28(10), 1993, pp. 920-923
Thirty-nine patients with cholelithiasis were prospectively studied to
evaluate the qualitative and quantitative differences between duodena
l bile and gallbladder bile. Duodenal bile obtained before cholecystec
tomy by nasoduodenal intubation and ceruletide injection was qualitati
vely similar to gallbladder bile obtained during surgery. Microscopic
cholesterol crystals as an indicator of cholesterol gallstones (n = 35
) could be detected in 31 (89%) and 35 (100%; p = NS), respectively. M
oreover, there was no difference in the molar percentage of three bili
ary lipids and the mean cholesterol saturation index (1.54 +/- 0.72 an
d 1.74 +/- 0.42; p = NS) of the two sources of bile. Duodenal bile was
, however, dilute as compared with gallbladder bile, as evidenced by l
ower cholesterol crystal counts (167 +/- 247 versus 705 +/- 978;p < 0.
01), lower total lipid concentration (5.8 +/- 2.7 versus 11.1 +/- 5.6
g/dl;p < 0.001), and lower concentrations (in mmol/l) of the three bil
e lipids-that is, total bile acids, phospholipids and cholesterol (p <
0.001). Good concentrated bile (total lipid concentration greater-tha
n-or-equal-to 5 g/dl) could be obtained in 74% of duodenal bile sample
s, compared with 90% of gallbladder bile (p = NS). Our study shows tha
t, although duodenal bile is dilute as compared with gallbladder bile,
it is qualitatively similar to gallbladder bile and, because of the e
ase and safety of its collection, can be used to study serial alterati
ons in biliary composition in individual subjects.