S. Harder et al., CONCENTRATION-EFFECT ANALYSIS OF VERAPAMIL - EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT APPROACHES, International journal of clinical pharmacology, therapy and toxicology, 31(10), 1993, pp. 469-475
Plasma concentration and PR-interval prolongation were correlated afte
r a single dose of 80 mg verapamil (trial A) and at steady-state durin
g one dose interval (80 mg verapamil t.i.d.) on day 7 (trial B) and da
y 14 (trial C) and the subsequent dose interval at the afternoon on da
y 14 (trial D). The pharmacokinetic parameters of verapamil indicated
a two-fold increase in AUC and C(max) at trial B and C when compared w
ith the single dose application, but AUC and C(max) were considerably
lesser during the afternoon dosing interval (trial D). For each subjec
t, concentration/effect analysis was established: according to a linea
r and a sigmoidal model, and using a plasma concentration vs effect ap
proach (1) and a semiparametric effect-site concentration vs effect ap
proach (2). The comparison of the two different approaches and models
showed that in general, the concentration/effect analysis based on the
linear model and with approach 2 gave the best description of the dro
motropic response to verapamil for the majority of the individuals. Ho
wever, approach 1 accounts for 30 to 50% of the concentration/effect c
urve established in the data subsets of trial A to D, and about 40% of
all curves in trial A, B and C can be more precisely described with t
he E(max)-model, whereas almost all curves obtained in trial D were be
st described by a linear model. A decrease in the responsiveness to ve
rapamil at steady-state was indicated by both models, but more precise
ly described by the parameters of the E(max)-model.