B. Ceyhan et al., COMPARISON OF THE BRONCHODILATOR EFFICACY OF NEBULIZED PIRENZEPINE AND IPRATOPIUM BROMIDE IN PATIENTS WITH AIRWAY OBSTRUCTIVE LUNG-DISEASE, International journal of clinical pharmacology, therapy and toxicology, 31(10), 1993, pp. 510-513
Ipratropium bromide (IB) is a non-selective muscarinic antagonist, who
se bronchodilator efficacy has been shown in reversible and irreversib
le obstructive airway diseases. Pirenzepine is a M1 receptor antagonis
t and effective in vagally-induced bronchoconstriction. To investigate
the bronchodilator efficacy of nebulized pirenzepine, we compared neb
ulized pirenzepine with nebulized IB and nebulized isotonic saline (pl
acebo). Eighteen patients with reversible and 18 patients with irrever
sible obstructive airway disease were studied. Nebulized isotonic sali
ne (placebo), 100 mcg nebulized pirenzepine and 125 mcg nebulized IB w
ere given on three consecutive days. Spirometry was performed prior to
nebulization and repeated at 5, 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes following
nebulized medication. A dose of 125 mcg IB resulted in a significant i
ncrease in FEV1 in patients with both reversible or irreversible bronc
hoconstriction (p <0.00001, p <0.03). IB at the same dose resulted in
an increase in FVC in patients with irreversible bronchoconstriction (
p <0.001) and an increase in FEF25-75 in patients with reversible bron
choconstriction (p <0.0003). Pirenzepine therapy resulted in no signif
icant change in the same parameters. It is concluded that nebulized pi
renzepine at a dose of 100 mcg does not have bronchodilator effect in
patients with reversible or irreversible bronchoconstriction.