C. Piotrowski et C. Zalewski, TRAINING IN PSYCHODIAGNOSTIC TESTING IN APA-APPROVED PSYD AND PHD CLINICAL-PSYCHOLOGY PROGRAMS, Journal of personality assessment, 61(2), 1993, pp. 394-405
Fifty-one percent (N = 80) of directors of doctoral PhD and PsyD progr
ams in clinical psychology, accredited by the American Psychological A
ssociation (APA), responded to a survey on assessment training. The st
udy was a replication of an earlier survey by Piotrowski and Keller (1
984b) on instruction, practices, and attitudes on testing. Our finding
s indicated that training emphasis in assessment coursework has change
d very little over the past decade. Intelligence testing was emphasize
d in most programs, followed by objective and projective personality a
ssessment. However, training in behavioral assessment techniques was r
equired in only half of the responding programs. There were no signifi
cant differences between PhD and PsyD programs concerning required cou
rsework in assessment. Factors that influence the perennial importance
of testing in the clinical core curriculum are discussed.