Je. Fischer et al., THE PULL-THROUGH PROCEDURE - TECHNICAL FACTORS IN INFLUENCING OUTCOME, WITH EMPHASIS ON POUCHITIS, Surgery, 114(4), 1993, pp. 828-835
Background The purpose of the study was to review those features that
we believed to be critical to the successful performance of the ileal
pouch-anal anastomosis, or pull-through, procedure, and specifically t
he complication of pouchitis. Methods. The charts of 205 patients who
successfully underwent ileal pouch-anal anastomosis procedure were rev
iewed. No follow-up was available in five patients; therefore the basi
s of this report and its analysis was based on 200 consecutive procedu
res in which at least two of the three surgeons participated. Particul
ar emphasis was placed on continence, particularly nighttime continenc
e. The incidence of pouchitis, either a single episode or intermittent
episodes, was surveyed. Particular attention was paid to the level of
rectal mucosectomy and anastomosis at the top of the columns of Morga
gni, thus retaining the transitional zone. Results. Only 5% of patient
s were incontinent in the absence of pouchitis. Twenty-five patients (
13%) wore a pad at night, but only nine (5%) wore a pad during the day
. Of those patients with pouchitis, 6% (12) have had a single episode
and 12% (23) were intermittently on medication. Therapy of pouchitis w
as usually carried out with ciprofloxacin 500 mg by mouth everyday or
twice a day. Conclusions. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is an excellent
procedure, provided technical details are adhered to. Satisfactory ou
tcome with respect to nighttime continence can be achieved with rectal
mucosectomy with minimal manipulation and retaining the transitional
epithelium, performing the pouch anastomosis at the top of the columns
of Morgagni. The incidence of pouchitis is disappointing but need not
be inhibiting of either patients or carrying out this life-saving pro
cedure in patients with ulcerative colitis and familial polyposis.