Jr. Boyle et al., IMPROVED RESPIRATORY-FUNCTION AND ANALGESIA CONTROL AFTER ENDOVASCULAR AAA REPAIR, Journal of endovascular surgery, 4(1), 1997, pp. 62-65
Purpose: Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair has been
proposed as a minimally invasive alternative to conventional surgery a
nd may offer significant advantages in respiratory function and analge
sic requirements due to the absence of an abdominal incision. Methods:
Respiratory function and analgesic requirements were quantified in 22
age-matched patients undergoing aneurysm repair under general anesthe
sia. Twelve patients underwent endovascular aneurysm repair, while 10
AAA patients had conventional surgery. One endovascular patient requir
ed conversion to conventional repair. Results: The endovascular group
required postoperative artificial ventilation for a shorter time (6 ve
rsus 21 hours, p < 0.05) and had lower PCA (patient-controlled analges
ia) morphine consumption (41 versus 133 mg, p < 0.05) than the convent
ional group. The endovascular group also had significantly better forc
ed expiratory volume and forced vital capacity at both 3 and 5 days wh
en expressed as percentages of the preoperative values (p < 0.05). Con
clusions: Endovascular AAA repair attenuates respiratory dysfunction a
ssociated with conventional surgery and reduces perioperative analgesi
a requirements.