The papers by Subramanyam (1996) and Kasanen, Kinnunen, and Niskanen (
KKN, 1996) both consider why managers manipulate accounting accruals.
Subramanyam finds that discretionary accruals are associated with seve
ral performance measures, and concludes that managers' accrual choices
increase the informativeness of accounting earnings. However, a stron
g competing alternative is that the 'Jones model' systematically misme
asures discretionary accruals, so that they contain a significant nond
iscretionary component. Unlike many US studies, KKN find strong eviden
ce of earnings management in Finland, where Finnish managers set earni
ngs to satisfy the demand for dividends by keiretsu-like institutional
investors.