Deliberation on the political implications of postmodern psychology is
essential, and Kendall and Michael (1997) raise a variety of interest
ing and important issues. Attempting to avoid the culs-de-sac created
by their fast and loose characterizations of both positions and politi
cs, I focus chiefly on the forms of theory favored by postmodern psych
ology. I contrast the political implications of actor-network theory,
favored by Kendall and Michael, with efforts of theorists to replace e
ssentialist views of the self with conceptions of socially constituted
being. All theory will necessarily bring privileges; reflexivity is n
o exit from ideology.