Se. Tomten et al., EXERCISE INTENSITY - AN IMPORTANT FACTOR IN THE ETIOLOGY OF MENSTRUALDYSFUNCTION, Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports, 6(6), 1996, pp. 329-336
The objective of this case control study was to compare training activ
ity in female long distance runners with irregular (IR, n = 13) and re
gular (R, n = 16) menstrual function, especially with regard to exerci
se intensity. Serum estradiol concentration during the follicular phas
e was considered normal in the R subjects (31 +/- 6 pg/l). In contrast
, the IR runners were clearly hypoestrogenic (11 +/- 1.6 pg/l). The tw
o groups had similar Vo(2max), anaerobic threshold (AT) and maximal he
art frequency (HFmax). In both groups AT was found at 88% of HFmax. Th
e two groups had similar mean race results in half marathons during th
e previous year. The number of running contests was, however, twice as
high in the IR group. A light portable pulse recorder was used to mon
itor heart rate during 1 week of regular training activity, and during
a controlled high intensity work-out. During a week with normal train
ing activity, an equal amount of training at high intensity levels (>8
5% HFmax) was performed by the two groups. The amount of training at l
ower intensities (<85% HFmax) was, however, more extensive in the grou
p with irregular menstrual function. During the controlled self-admini
stered, high intensity work-out, the amounts of training at and above
AT were equal in the two groups. In conclusion: no difference in exten
t of high intensity training between long distance runners with regula
r and irregular menstrual function could be found in the present study
group. The IR runners did, however, have significantly more training
activity at lower intensity levels, and more frequent race participati
on.