Je. Zimmerman et al., IMPROVING INTENSIVE-CARE - OBSERVATIONS BASED ON ORGANIZATIONAL CASE-STUDIES IN 9 INTENSIVE-CARE UNITS - A PROSPECTIVE, MULTICENTER STUDY, Critical care medicine, 21(10), 1993, pp. 1443-1451
Objective. To examine organizational practices associated with higher
and lower intensive care unit (ICU) outcome performance. Design: Prosp
ective multicenter study. On-site organizational analysis; prospective
inception cohort. Setting. Nine ICUs (one medical, two surgical, six
medical-surgical) at five teaching and four nonteaching hospitals. Par
ticipants: A sample of 3,672 ICU admissions; 316 nurses and 202 physic
ians.Materials and Methods. Interviews and direct observations by a te
am of clinical and organizational researchers. Demographic, physiologi
c, and outcome data for an average of 408 admissions per ICU; and ques
tionnaires on ICU structure and organization. The ratio of actual/pred
icted hospital death rate was used to measure ICU effectiveness; the r
atio of actual/predicted length of ICU stay was used to assess efficie
ncy. Measurements and Main Results: ICUs with superior risk-adjusted s
urvival could not be distinguished by structural and organizational qu
estionnaires or by global judgment following on-site analysis. Superio
r organizational practices among these ICUs were related to a patient-
centered culture, strong medical and nursing leadership, effective com
munication and coordination, and open, collaborative approaches to sol
ving problems and managing conflict. Conclusions: The best and worst o
rganizational practices found in this study can be used by ICU leaders
as a checklist for improving ICU management.