PROPHYLACTIC PROCAINAMIDE FOR PREVENTION OF ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION AFTERCORONARY-ARTERY BYPASS-GRAFTING - A PROSPECTIVE, DOUBLE-BLIND, RANDOMIZED, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED PILOT-STUDY

Citation
Gw. Laub et al., PROPHYLACTIC PROCAINAMIDE FOR PREVENTION OF ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION AFTERCORONARY-ARTERY BYPASS-GRAFTING - A PROSPECTIVE, DOUBLE-BLIND, RANDOMIZED, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED PILOT-STUDY, Critical care medicine, 21(10), 1993, pp. 1474-1478
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
Emergency Medicine & Critical Care
Journal title
ISSN journal
00903493
Volume
21
Issue
10
Year of publication
1993
Pages
1474 - 1478
Database
ISI
SICI code
0090-3493(1993)21:10<1474:PPFPOA>2.0.ZU;2-E
Abstract
Objective. To evaluate the effect of prophylactic procainamide on the frequency of postoperative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing myocardial revascularization. Design: Prospective, randomized, double- blind, placebo-controlled pilot study.Setting. Surgical intensive care unit and wards at a university hospital affiliate. Patients: A total of 46 patients undergoing myocardial revascularization. Interventions: Twenty-two patients received procainamide (procainamide group) and 24 patients received placebo (control group). Procainamide was administe red to the procainamide group within 1 hr of the patient's arrival in the intensive care unit and consisted of an intravenous loading dose ( 12 mg/kg) followed by a maintenance dose (2 mg/min) of procainamide. T he control group received a similar volume of placebo. When the patien t was able to take oral medication, the study drug was administered or ally in a weight-adjusted dosage. Measurements: Electrocardiograms (EK Gs) were continuously monitored. Procainamide and N-acetyl procainamid e serum concentrations were measured, and the dosages in the procainam ide group were adjusted by an independent observer. The study drug was continued for 5 days or until an event occurred that resulted in dism issal from the study. Main Results. The procainamide group and control group had similar preoperative demographic descriptors and operative variables, except for the mean left ventricular ejection fraction, whi ch was lower in the control group than in the procainamide group (60% vs. 68%, p = .03 [Wilcoxon rank-sum test]). There were no hospital dea ths. The number of episodes of postoperative atrial fibrillation was s ignificantly reduced in the procainamide group (5 episodes in 129 pati ent days at risk [3.9%/day at risk]) compared with the control group ( 17 episodes in 161 patient days at risk [10.6%/day at risk], p = .04 [ Fisher's exact test]). Complication rates were similar in both groups. Conclusions: In a pilot trial, prophylactic procainamide reduced the number of episodes of atrial fibrillation in patients after coronary a rtery bypass grafting. Procainamide also decreased the number of patie nts who experienced postoperative atrial fibrillation. However, due to the small sample size, this latter difference was not statistically s ignificant. Further studies are needed to confirm this encouraging tre nd.