PERSISTENCE AND DEGRADATION OF [C-14] ATRAZINE AND [C-14] DEISOPROPYLATRAZINE AS AFFECTED BY SOIL DEPTH AND MOISTURE CONDITIONS

Citation
El. Kruger et al., PERSISTENCE AND DEGRADATION OF [C-14] ATRAZINE AND [C-14] DEISOPROPYLATRAZINE AS AFFECTED BY SOIL DEPTH AND MOISTURE CONDITIONS, Environmental toxicology and chemistry, 12(11), 1993, pp. 1959-1967
Citations number
35
Categorie Soggetti
Toxicology,"Environmental Sciences",Chemistry
ISSN journal
07307268
Volume
12
Issue
11
Year of publication
1993
Pages
1959 - 1967
Database
ISI
SICI code
0730-7268(1993)12:11<1959:PADO[A>2.0.ZU;2-P
Abstract
The fate of atrazine and one of its degradation products deisopropytat razine has been investigated using radiotracers under laboratory condi tions. The metabolic route and rate were investigated under saturated and unsaturated conditions, with samples of soil taken from four depth s down to 120 cm. The major degradation products identified from [C-14 ]atrazine and [C-14]deisopropylatrazine treatments were deethylatrazin e and didealkylatrazine, respectively. The detected minor degradation products were hydroxyatrazine, deethylhydroxyatrazine, and deisopropyl hydroxyatrazine. Under unsaturated conditions atrazine and deisopropyl atrazine were least persistent in the top 30 cm, and their persistence increased with increase in depth. The half-life of atrazine under uns aturated conditions increased with depth and ranged from 41 to 231 d f or the studied depths, whereas the half-life of deisopropylatrazine ra nged from 32 to 173 d. Deisopropylatrazine was more susceptible to min eralization than atrazine, and the amount of mineralization decreased with increase in depth. Bound residues were formed to a greater extent in surface soils. Under saturated conditions at the 90- to 120-cm dep th, the half-life of atrazine was 87 d. Deisopropylatrazine was less p ersistent in saturated soil than in unsaturated soil at the 90- to 120 -cm depth, with a half-life of 58 and 173 d, respectively. The increas ed degradability of deisopropylatrazine as compared with atrazine and the decreased persistence of deisopropylatrazine under saturated soil conditions provides a logical explanation for its relatively low conce ntrations in ground water as compared with atrazine.