We studied habitat use by boreal owls (Aegolius funereus) in the north
ern Rocky Mountains from january through August during 1984-88. Habita
t use was examined at several spatial scales. The geographic distribut
ion and range of life zones used by boreal owls were documented in wes
tern Montana, Idaho, and northwestern Wyoming. Habitat use, at the lev
el of the home range, and microhabitats used for nesting, roosting, an
d foraging were observed in the Frank Church River of No Return Wilder
ness (RNRW) of central Idaho. Boreal owls inhabited forests with in th
e spruce-fir (Picea spp.-Abies spp.) life zone throughout the mountain
s of Montana, Idaho, and northern Wyoming. Nearly 90% of breeding terr
itories located throughout this region were in subalpine fir (Abies la
siocarpa) habitat types (based on Steele et al. 1981), and no owls wer
e detected below 1,292 m. Within the RNRW, owl breeding sites occurred
(n = 28) in mixed-conifer (39%), spruce-fir (25%), Douglas-fir (Pseud
otsuga menziesii) (18%), and aspen (Populus tremuloides) (18%) stands.
Lodgepole-pine (Pinus contorta) forest, which was the most common veg
etation type in the area, was not used for nesting. Nest sites were re
stricted to mature and old forest stands with complex physical structu
re. Roosting habitat differed between winter and summer. Winter roosts
differed little from available forest cover whereas summer roosts had
greater canopy cover, higher tree density, and higher basal area than
paired random sites. During summer, the owls used cool microsites for
roosting; during hot weather, boreal owls frequently exhibited sympto
ms of heat stress by gullar fluttering and perching with wings lowered
. The best foraging habitat was associated with older spruce-fir stand
s. These sites had prey populations 2-10 times greater than other site
s and provided open forest structure that facilitated hunting. Because
of the wide geographic dispersion of suitable nesting, roosting, and
foraging habitat, the owls used large home ranges; ranges averaged 1,4
51 +/- 552 ha in winter (n = 13) and 1,182 +/- 335 ha in summer (n = 1
5). Boreal owls at our intensive study site fed primarily on small mam
mals in both winter and summer. During both seasons, southern red-back
ed voles (Clethrionomys gapperi) were the most frequent prey, composin
g 36% of all prey items. In winter, northern flying squirrels (Glaucom
ys sabrinus) were captured by females (14% of prey items) but not male
s. During snow-free seasons, boreal owls captured northern pocket goph
ers (Thomomys talpoides), yellow-pine chipmunks (Tamias amoenus), and
western jumping mice (Zapus princeps) that were unavailable when the g
round was snow covered. The size of breeding populations and breeding
success varied from year to year. During 1 of 4 years, few owls attemp
ted to breed, and we knew of none that raised young. Estimates of demo
graphic characteristics of boreal owls suggest that the population dec
lined during our investigation. We estimated annual adult survival as
46% (95% CI = 23-91%), and production by nesting females averaged 2.3
(+/- 0.542) young per successful nest. We documented long distance mov
ements by adult owls, which support the contention that immigration of
nomadic owls may help maintain populations that would otherwise face
local extinction. These results suggest that conservation of boreal ow
ls will require forest management that maintains the distribution and
abundance of mature and older forest stands. Because boreal owls in th
e northern Rocky Mountains occur in a narrow life zone, populations ex
ist in isolated patches that cover a relatively small portion of the l
andscape. To maintain quality habitat at any given site will require s
nag retention and timber harvest practices that retain forest structur
e. A shift to uneven-age management or modifications of even-age syste
ms that retain particular old forest characteristics in spruce-fir for
est should meet the owls' needs for nesting structures and roosting si
tes while maintaining prey populations.