Tr. Franson et al., EVALUATION OF NEW ANTIINFECTIVE DRUGS FOR THE TREATMENT OF VASCULAR ACCESS DEVICE ASSOCIATED BACTEREMIA AND FUNGEMIA, Clinical infectious diseases, 17(4), 1993, pp. 789-793
For clinical trials of anti-infective drugs for the treatment of vascu
lar access device-related bloodstream infections, patients should be i
dentified and enrolled on the basis of current standards for the clini
cal diagnosis of such infections. To ensure comparability of patients,
only those infected with staphylococci and Candida species should be
included. A prospective, randomized, double-blind design is recommende
d. Future protocols may include abbreviated courses of therapy, treatm
ent with combinations of drugs, or a progression from parenteral to or
al therapy. Clinical response is judged as cure, failure, or indetermi
nate response; there is no ''improved'' category. Microbiological resp
onse is categorized as eradication, persistence, or relapse and is of
paramount importance. Several months of follow-up may be necessary for
the detection of late relapses or metastatic infections. This guideli
ne does not apply to studies of bacteremia or fungemia secondary to no
n-device-related, organ-based primary infections (e.g., pneumonia, uri
nary tract infection), which should be assessed in relation to the pri
mary disorder.