PREVENTIVE TREATMENT OF EARLY HEART-FAILU RE AND ASYMPTOMATIC LEFT-VENTRICULAR DYSFUNCTION - ROLE OF ACE-INHIBITORS IN POST MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION TREATMENT STRATEGIES

Citation
Fx. Kleber et G. Baumann, PREVENTIVE TREATMENT OF EARLY HEART-FAILU RE AND ASYMPTOMATIC LEFT-VENTRICULAR DYSFUNCTION - ROLE OF ACE-INHIBITORS IN POST MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION TREATMENT STRATEGIES, Acta medica austriaca, 20(4), 1993, pp. 95-99
Citations number
41
Categorie Soggetti
Medicine, General & Internal
Journal title
ISSN journal
03038173
Volume
20
Issue
4
Year of publication
1993
Pages
95 - 99
Database
ISI
SICI code
0303-8173(1993)20:4<95:PTOEHR>2.0.ZU;2-#
Abstract
Myocardial infarction has become the most important condition causing congestive heart failure. Several treatment regimens compete with each other in the early and later post myocardial infarction phase focussi ng on different pathophysiologic mechanisms. In this review emphasis i s put on absolute risks and absolute risk reductions in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction. In the first year mortality is still as high as 10% and the major risks are sudden unexpected death, reinfarction, and congestive heart failure. In the following years sudden death and development of congestive heart failu re become less prominent, while a considerable risk of reinfarction pe rsists. Thrombolysis and betablockade are the most important drugs in the acute infarction phase leading to a marked reduction in one year m ortality. In the first year after infarction betablockade has an estab lished place in the prevention of sudden death; revascularization and aspirin are established in reinfarction prophylaxis. However, since mo st drugs lower 1 year mortality by 0.5 to 2% only, drugs like ACE inhi bitors that influence more than one risk, i.e. sudden death and reinfa rction as well as deterioration of pump dysfunction might play a more important role in the therapeutic strategy after myocardial infarction . A supplementation by one or two drugs aiming at the individually est imated leading risks might be the best choice in patients with left ve ntricular dysfunction today.