B. Brembillaperrot et al., SHOULD THE PROTOCOL OF PROGRAMMED VENTRIC ULAR STIMULATION BE ADAPTEDFOR EACH PATIENT, Archives des maladies du coeur et des vaisseaux, 89(11), 1996, pp. 1413-1416
The authors report the case of a 56 year old patient in whom the mecha
nisms of a wide QRS complex tachycardia recorded on an intensive care
monitor could not be determined. The patient also had episodes of atri
al flutter with left bundle branch block. Programmed Ventricular stimu
lation with 3 extrastimuli triggered a non-specific ventricular flutte
r. One week later, the patient was resuscitated from a cardiac arrest
which was undocumented. It was therefore important to elucidate the me
chanism of the initial tachycardia. A second session of programmed ven
tricular stimulation was undertaken. As the use of 2 extrastimuli trig
gered runs of unsustained polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, the cla
ssical protocol was stopped. An infusion of low-dose isoproterenol was
used to repeat programmed stimulation with a single extrastimulus. Th
is protocol triggered sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia at
240/min. The diagnosis of ventricular tachycardia could therefore be
continued.