D. Spina et al., DISTINCTION BETWEEN DIFFUSE CUTANEOUS MALIGNANT FOLLICULAR CENTER CELL LYMPHOMA AND LYMPHOID HYPERPLASIA BY COMPUTERIZED NUCLEAR IMAGE-ANALYSIS, The American journal of dermatopathology, 15(5), 1993, pp. 415-422
The difficult differential diagnosis between the diffuse variants of c
utaneous lymphoid hyperplasia (CLH; synonym: pseudolymphoma) and malig
nant follicular center cell lymphomas (FCCL) often requires a multidis
ciplinary approach. Eighteen CLH and 11 FCCL, diagnosed by conventiona
l histology and immunophenotyping and subsequently examined with a pol
ymerase chain reaction to show clonal immunoglobulin heavy-chain gene
rearrangements, were subjected to a novel type of automated nuclear im
age analysis. Of all nuclear parameters tested in azure A-stained semi
thin sections, the mean nuclear profile area (TN) of lymphoid cells wa
s the best criterion to distinguish between CLH and FCCL (p = 9 X 10(-
6)). Additional distinctive features, in the order of decreasing signi
ficance, were the SD of TN; all chromatin textural parameters combined
; and the light and the dark fractions of the central nuclear profile
areas. Parameters related to the chromatin pattern were independent of
nuclear profile size in FCCL, but not in CLH. Two lesions registered
as CLH displayed the nuclear characteristics favoring this diagnosis,
but showed B-cell monoclonality at the DNA level. In conclusion, compu
terized nuclear image analysis is a helpful additional diagnostic tool
in the evaluation of diffuse CLH and cutaneous FCCL.