Deep dyslexia is an acquired reading disorder marked by the occurrence
of semantic errors (e.g. reading RIVER as ''ocean''). In addition, pa
tients exhibit a number of other symptoms, including visual and morpho
logical effects in their errors, a part-of-speech effect, and an advan
tage for concrete over abstract words. Deep dyslexia poses a distinct
challenge for cognitive neuropsychology because there is little unders
tanding of why such a variety of symptoms should co-occur in virtually
all known patients. Hinton and Shallice (1991) replicated the co-occu
rrence of visual and semantic errors by lesioning a recurrent connecti
onist network trained to map from orthography to semantics. Although t
he success of their simulations is encouraging, there is little unders
tanding of what underlying principles are responsible for them. In thi
s paper we evaluate and, where possible, improve on the most important
design decisions made by Hinton and Shallice, relating to the task, t
he network architecture, the training procedure, and the testing proce
dure. We identify four properties of networks that underly their abili
ty to reproduce the deep dyslexic symptom-complex: distributed orthogr
aphic and semantic representations, gradient descent learning, attract
ors for word meanings, and greater richness of concrete vs. abstract s
emantics. The first three of these are general connectionist principle
s and the last is based on earlier theorising. Taken together, the res
ults demonstrate the usefulness of a connectionist approach to underst
anding deep dyslexia in particular, and the viability of connectionist
neuropsychology in general.