''Willingness to pay'' (WTP) and ''willingness to accept'' (WTA) measu
res of welfare change have been found to differ substantially when eli
cited from surveys or experimental market transactions. Conventional e
conomic theory suggests that the difference between WTP and WTA should
be smaller than those observed in empirical tests. This study focuses
on the hypothesis that the availability of substitutes for the good b
eing evaluated affects the difference between the two measures. The re
sults suggest that the existence of a substitute does reduce the diffe
rence between WTP and WTA, however, the difference between these two m
easures is significant with or without substitutes.