Increasingly, conjoint analysts are being asked to design and analyze
studies involving large numbers of attributes and/or attribute levels.
Various types of approaches, including attribute bridging, Adaptive C
onjoint Analysis, and hybrid models have been proposed to deal with th
e problem. This paper describes recent developments in hybrid modeling
. Four hybrid models are described and compared in terms of their perf
ormance in an industry-based study entailing 15 product attributes. Co
mparisons are made in terms of internal cross-validation, market share
estimates, attribute importances clustering, and its relationship to
exogenous background variables. The proposed models are also compared
to selected models from the transportation science literature. The aut
hors emphasize the point that comparative model performance may strong
ly depend on the ways in which the models are to be used.