Mr. Costanzonordin et al., ENDOCARDIAL INFILTRATES IN THE TRANSPLANTED HEART - CLINICAL-SIGNIFICANCE EMERGING FROM THE ANALYSIS OF 5026 ENDOMYOCARDIAL BIOPSY SPECIMENS, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation, 12(5), 1993, pp. 741-747
To further elucidate the significance of endocardial infiltrates in he
art transplant patients, the presence, frequency, and type of endocard
ial infiltrates were evaluated in 5026 endomyocardial biopsy specimens
obtained from 200 heart transplant patients 0 to 75 months after hear
t transplantation. The relationship of endocardial infiltrates to immu
nologic, clinical, and demographic variables was then explored. Endoca
rdial infiltrates were detected in 557 endomyocardial biopsy specimens
(11%) from 117 heart transplant patients (58%) at 6.3 +/- 9.4 months
(x +/- SD; range, 0 to 49 months) after heart transplantation. Heart t
ransplant patients with endocardial infiltrates were younger (p = 0.03
), had a greater incidence of idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy before
heart transplantation (p = 0.05), and included a greater percentage o
f females (p < 0.05). Both total and treated rejection rates were sign
ificantly higher in patients with endocardial infiltrates versus those
without endocardial infiltrates (p = 0.0001). Rejection on the subseq
uent endomyocardial biopsies was more often present in endocardial bio
psy specimens with endocardial infiltrates than in those without endoc
ardial infiltrates, both in the presence (37% versus 24%; p < 0.001) a
nd absence (33% versus 19%; p < 0.0001) of concomitant findings of rej
ection. No association was identified between endocardial infiltrates
and posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorder, cytomegalovirus
infection, Epstein-Barr virus infection, or cardiac allograft vasculop
athy. Multivariate regression analysis confirmed that the occurrence o
f endocardial infiltrates is associated with rejection when adjustment
is made for patient's age, gender, heart disease before transplantati
on, follow-up time, and number of endomyocardial biopsies after heart
transplantation (p = 0.0001). Conclusions: (1) Endocardial infiltrates
may occur with or without associated endomyocardial biopsy findings o
f rejection. (2) The highly significant association between endocardia
l infiltrates and endomyocardial biopsy findings of rejection suggests
that endocardial infiltrates may be a manifestation of rejection. (3)
The higher frequency of endocardial infiltrates in younger and female
heart transplant patients, groups that are known to be at higher risk
for rejection, lends further support to this hypothesis. (4) Because
endocardial infiltrates, even in the absence of endomyocardial biopsy
findings of rejection, predict subsequent rejection, large-scale prosp
ective studies are needed to determine whether the finding of endocard
ial infiltrates on endomyocardial biopsy warrants closer rejection sur
veillance or intensification of immunosuppression.