M. Waser et al., IRREVERSIBILITY OF CYCLOSPORINE-INDUCED RENAL-FUNCTION IMPAIRMENT IN HEART-TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation, 12(5), 1993, pp. 846-850
The use of cyclosporine therapy for heart transplant recipients has be
en associated with a significant improvement of graft survival. Renal
function impairment is a frequent finding in patients chronically trea
ted with cyclosporine. The purpose of this prospective randomized stud
y was to establish renal function in a group of heart transplant recip
ients receiving chronic cyclosporine treatment and to test the hypothe
sis of reversibility of cyclosporine-induced nephropathy by late reduc
tion of cyclosporine. A total of 28 patients who underwent operation a
t least 18 months before this study began were randomly assigned to ei
ther group A (n = 14), in which the whole-blood polyclonal cyclosporin
e target trough level was reduced from 400 to 600 mug/L to 200 to 400
mug/L, and group B (n = 14), in which the level was maintained at 400
to 600 mug/L. Renal and cardiac function were assessed by paraaminohip
puric acid, inulin and lithium clearances and heart catheterization, r
espectively, at entry and 4 months later. Cellular rejection in the tr
ansplanted heart was monitored by at least four endomyocardial biopsie
s every 14 days with the histologic Texas scale (grading: 0 to 10). In
heart recipients renal blood flow (592 +/- 202 ml/min/1.73 m2) and gl
omerular-filtration rate (74 +/- 33 ml/min/1.73 m2) were significantly
lower (p < 0.01), and mean arterial blood pressure (109 +/- 13 mm Hg)
and renal vascular resistance (22.4 +/- 9 mm Hg/dl/min/1.73 m2) were
significantly higher than the corresponding values in normal controls
(p < 0.01). Whole blood polyclonal cyclosporine levels at entry and en
d of the trial were 519 +/- 83 and 238 +/- 101 mug/L (group Ap < 0.001
) and 490 +/- 92 and 510 +/- 110 mug/L (group B, NS). During the cyclo
sporine reduction trial no significant change occurred for all renal f
unction parameters in both groups and particularly in patients with cy
closporine reduction (group A). However, in patients of group A the Te
xas-score rejection grade increased from 1.98 +/- 0.9 to 2.43 +/- 0.9
(p < 0.05). These data indicate that heart transplant recipients recei
ving chronic cyclosporine therapy often have moderate renal function i
mpairment. Late cyclosporine reduction as used in this study does not
improve renal function impairment and may be associated with an increa
sed risk of cellular rejection in the transplanted heart.