WERE THE RETURNS FROM STOCKS AND BONDS OF DIFFERENT COUNTRIES REALLY DIFFERENT IN THE 1980S

Citation
Al. Turner et Cr. Hensel, WERE THE RETURNS FROM STOCKS AND BONDS OF DIFFERENT COUNTRIES REALLY DIFFERENT IN THE 1980S, Management science, 39(7), 1993, pp. 835-844
Citations number
31
Categorie Soggetti
Management,"Operatione Research & Management Science
Journal title
ISSN journal
00251909
Volume
39
Issue
7
Year of publication
1993
Pages
835 - 844
Database
ISI
SICI code
0025-1909(1993)39:7<835:WTRFSA>2.0.ZU;2-I
Abstract
We analyzed the total equity returns of indexes from Australia, Canada , Germany, Japan, the UK, and the US and total fixed income returns of indexes from all but Australia (excluded due to lack of data) to see if the returns of stocks and bonds were statistically different across markets during the 1980s. At the end of 1989, these countries represe nted over 87% of the market capitalization of the Morgan Stanley Capit al International (MSCI) World Equity Index and over 88% of the Salomon Brothers World Bond Index. This study used monthly observations from January 1980 through December 1989 and examined returns based in local currency and hedged and unhedged US dollars. We found that sample mea n stock and bond returns during the 1980s were statistically indisting uishable across countries. However, because the sample variances were so large relative to the sample means, it would have been difficult to detect differences in population means by any test. We found evidence of variance heterogeneity, which may be explainable by other economic factors. We also found that intercountry stock and bond correlations were not significantly different. Thus, we confirmed the results of ot her researchers, such as Jobson and Korkie (1981), but in a broader gl obal context using more asset types and different statistical tests. O ur work suggests reducing the number of input estimates to a MV global asset allocation problem. For practitioners trying to put MV analysis to use, these findings could have a significant effect on the practic e of asset allocation.