Highlights of the previous papers in this series are reviewed. Methodo
logy developed for the MINK study has improved the ability of impacts
analysis to deal with questions of (1) spatial and temporal variabilit
y in climate change; (2) CO2-enrichment effects; (3) the reactions of
complex enterprises (farms and forests) to climate change and their ab
ility to adjust and adapt; and (4) integrated effects on current and,
more particularly, on future regional economies. The methodology also
provides for systematic study of adjustment and adaptation opportuniti
es and of the inter-industry linkages that determine what the overall
impacts on the regional economy might be. The analysis shows that with
a 1930s 'dust bowl' climate the region-wide economic impacts would be
small, after adjustments in affected sectors. In this final paper we
consider whether synergistic effects among sectoral impacts and more s
evere climate change scenarios might alter this conclusion. The MINK a
nalysis, as is, leads to the conclusion that a strong research capacit
y will be required to ensure that technologies facilitating adaptation
to climate change will be available when needed. The capacity to deal
with climate change also requires an open economy allowing for free t
rade and movement of people and for institutions that protect unpriced
environmental values. More severe climate scenarios and negative syne
rgisms can only strengthen these conclusions.