Studies evaluating surface broadcast urea-based N sources in no-till c
orn (Zea mays L.) have been primarily conducted with continuous corn.
Most corn grown in Missouri follows soybean [Glycine mar (L.) Merr.].
Our objective was to evaluate no-till, continuous corn and corn follow
ing soybean response to surface applied ammonium nitrate (AN) and urea
-based N sources. Field studies were conducted at three Missouri sites
during 1988-1990. Factorial combinations of rotation (continuous corn
and corn-soybean) N source [AN, urea, urea ammonium nitrate (UAN), an
d UAN + ammonium thiosulfate (UAN + ATS)], and N rate (67, 135, and 20
2 kg ha-1) were studied in a split-block design. Nitrogen rate and sou
rce affected grain yields each site year. Ammonium nitrate was superio
r to the urea-based N sources in 5 of 8 site-years. Averaged across si
te-years, grain yields (Mg ha-1 were 8.22 for AN, 7.57 for urea, 7.09
for UAN + ATS, and 6.99 for UAN. Apparent fertilizer N losses were est
imated at 11% for urea, 18% for UAN and 17% for UAN + ATS. Ammonium th
iosulfate did not improve the performance of UAN. Grain yield response
s to applied N were greater with continuous corn than corn following s
oybean. Continuous corn also resulted in larger yield differences betw
een N sources. In continuous corn, AN resulted in greater grain yield
than urea by 0.81 Mg ha-1, than UAN by 1.35 and Mg ha-1, and than UAN
+ ATS by 1.32 Mg ha-1. For corn following soybean, the yield advantage
for AN was 0.42 Mg ha-1 greater than urea, 0.98 than UAN, and 0.82 th
an UAN + ATS. Therefore, reduced fertilizer efficiency of surface appl
ied urea-based N sources appears to be a problem in both continuous no
-till corn and no-till corn following soybean.