The debate over the costs of GHG emission reduction has become more co
mplex recently as disagreements over the existence of economic and env
ironmental double dividends have been added to discussions over the ex
istence of a negative cost potential, We argue that basic assumptions
about economic efficiency the (sub-)optimality of the baseline and the
rate of technical change are more important than model structure, and
we underline the importance of the timing of decisions for determinin
g the costs, Moreover the use of a single baseline 'no policy' scenari
o and several policy intervention scenarios may be fundamentally misle
ading in the longer term simply because the very idea of a business as
usual scenario is deeply problematic, Ultimately the debate turns on
political judgments about the desirability of alternative development
paths. Copyright (C) 1996 Elsevier Science Ltd.