ANTI-HUMAN KAPPA-OPIOID RECEPTOR ANTIBODIES - CHARACTERIZATION OF SITE-DIRECTED NEUTRALIZING ANTIBODIES SPECIFIC FOR A PEPTIDE KAPPA-R(33-52) DERIVED FROM THE PREDICTED AMINO-TERMINAL REGION OF THE HUMAN KAPPA-RECEPTOR
Citation
Rr. Buchner et al., ANTI-HUMAN KAPPA-OPIOID RECEPTOR ANTIBODIES - CHARACTERIZATION OF SITE-DIRECTED NEUTRALIZING ANTIBODIES SPECIFIC FOR A PEPTIDE KAPPA-R(33-52) DERIVED FROM THE PREDICTED AMINO-TERMINAL REGION OF THE HUMAN KAPPA-RECEPTOR, The Journal of immunology, 158(4), 1997, pp. 1670-1680
Categorie Soggetti
Immunology
Journal title
The Journal of immunology
SICI code
0022-1767(1997)158:4<1670:AKRA-C>2.0.ZU;2-K
Abstract
Site-directed polyclonal Abs specific for a synthetic peptide with seq
uence homology to the predicted N-terminal sequence of the human kappa
opioid receptor [anti-kappa R-(33-52)] are capable of binding to norm
al human cells and cell lines expressing mRNA specific for the human k
appa receptor. Flow cytometric analysis of 1) a neuronal cell line (NT
2), 2) blood-derived CD14(+) monocytes, 3) monocyte-like cell lines (U
937 and THP 1), 4) blood-derived CD3(+) T cells and a T cell line, and
5) human B cell lines bound anti-kappa R-(33-52) in a specific manner
. Anti-kappa R-(33-52) was also found to specifically neutralize the i
mmunosuppressive activities associated with the kappa R-selective agon
ist U50,488H. This antiserum was found to block U50,488H-mediated inhi
bition of 1) Staphylococcus aureus Cowen strain I-induced B and T lymp
hocyte proliferation, 2) PHA-induced T lymphocyte proliferation, and 3
) S. aureus Cowen strain I-induced IgG production. However, this antis
erum failed to neutralize mu R-selective agonist (Tyr-D-Ala-Gly-NMe-Ph
e-Gly-ol)-mediated suppression of IgG synthesis. Finally, the kappa R-
selective antagonist nor-binal-torphimine hydrochloride inhibits the b
inding of anti-kappa R-(33-52) to the U937 cell line. These results su
ggest that anti-kappa R-(33-52) specifically interacts with the human
kappa R molecule. Studies conducted with anti-kappa R-(33-52) indicate
d that this antiserum effectively blocked U50,488H-mediated immunosupp
ression, but by itself did not enhance or suppress lymphocyte activati
on. These data suggest that anti-kappa R-(33-52) 1) does not interact
with the effector binding site of the receptor, but sterically interfe
res with U50,488H binding to the receptor; and/or 2) the antiserum int
eracts with a secondary binding site that is important for ligand bind
ing, but may not be involved in signal transduction.