RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL COMPARING BALLOON DILATATION TO TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF PROSTATE FOR BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA

Citation
Cf. Donatucci et al., RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL COMPARING BALLOON DILATATION TO TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF PROSTATE FOR BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA, Urology, 42(1), 1993, pp. 42-49
Citations number
34
Categorie Soggetti
Urology & Nephrology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00904295
Volume
42
Issue
1
Year of publication
1993
Pages
42 - 49
Database
ISI
SICI code
0090-4295(1993)42:1<42:RCCBDT>2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
To evaluate the effectiveness and clinical outcome of patients treated by balloon dilatation of the prostate (BDP) compared with transurethr al resection of the prostate (TURP) we performed a prospective, random ized clinical trial. Fifty-one men were randomized to either BDP or TU RP. Both groups demonstrated a significant decrease in symptom score f rom preoperative levels (TURP 13.6 to 6.0 [p < 0.05]; BDP 14.1 to 8.1 [p < 0.01] at 1 year). The TURP group improved peak urinary flows; whi le, after initial improvement, the balloon group returned to pre-proce dure levels. At twelve months 14 of 19 BDP patients (74%) and 14 of 18 TURP patients (78%) considered themselves improved. BDP results in sy mptomatic improvement; however, the effect may not persist. Objective improvement after BDP does not always occur. The morbidity of BDP is l ow and compares favorably to that of TURP. Thus BDP does not appear to be as effective as TURP and may offer only temporary relief of sympto ms.