Cf. Donatucci et al., RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL COMPARING BALLOON DILATATION TO TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF PROSTATE FOR BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA, Urology, 42(1), 1993, pp. 42-49
To evaluate the effectiveness and clinical outcome of patients treated
by balloon dilatation of the prostate (BDP) compared with transurethr
al resection of the prostate (TURP) we performed a prospective, random
ized clinical trial. Fifty-one men were randomized to either BDP or TU
RP. Both groups demonstrated a significant decrease in symptom score f
rom preoperative levels (TURP 13.6 to 6.0 [p < 0.05]; BDP 14.1 to 8.1
[p < 0.01] at 1 year). The TURP group improved peak urinary flows; whi
le, after initial improvement, the balloon group returned to pre-proce
dure levels. At twelve months 14 of 19 BDP patients (74%) and 14 of 18
TURP patients (78%) considered themselves improved. BDP results in sy
mptomatic improvement; however, the effect may not persist. Objective
improvement after BDP does not always occur. The morbidity of BDP is l
ow and compares favorably to that of TURP. Thus BDP does not appear to
be as effective as TURP and may offer only temporary relief of sympto
ms.