PHARYNGEAL WALL CARCINOMA TREATED WITH RADIOTHERAPY - IMPACT OF TREATMENT TECHNIQUE AND FRACTIONATION

Citation
Da. Fein et al., PHARYNGEAL WALL CARCINOMA TREATED WITH RADIOTHERAPY - IMPACT OF TREATMENT TECHNIQUE AND FRACTIONATION, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 26(5), 1993, pp. 751-757
Citations number
32
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
ISSN journal
03603016
Volume
26
Issue
5
Year of publication
1993
Pages
751 - 757
Database
ISI
SICI code
0360-3016(1993)26:5<751:PWCTWR>2.0.ZU;2-K
Abstract
Purpose: To determine whether a modification in treatment technique an d the routine use of twice-daily fractionation have influenced the lik elihood of local control in carcinomas of the hypopharyngeal and/or or opharyngeal wall. Methods and Materials: Between October 1964 and July 1990, 99 patients with invasive, previously untreated T1-T4 squamous cell carcinoma of the pharyngeal wall were treated with continuous-cou rse, external-beam radiotherapy with curative intent at the University of Florida. All patients had a minimum 2-year follow-up. Results: The 2-year local control rates for patients treated with once-daily vs. t wice-daily fractionation were T1, 100% each; T2, 67% vs. 92%; T3, 43% vs. 80%; and T4, 17% vs. 50%. The 2-year local control rates for patie nts treated with our former technique (posterior border placed at midd le of the vertebral body when the portals were reduced off the spinal cord) vs. our current, modified technique (posterior border placed at posterior edge of the vertebral body) were T1, 100% each; T2, 57% vs. 100%; T3, 46% vs. 73%; and T4, 29% vs. 75%. The parameters of T stage, fractionation schedule, primary site, (oropharynx vs. hypopharynx) tr eatment technique, and lateral vs. posterior pharyngeal wall location were evaluated in a multivariate analysis for the end point of local c ontrol. T stage (p = .003), fractionation schedule (p = .001), and pri mary site (p = .028) were of independent prognostic Conclusion: Twice- daily fractionation was the most important treatment-related variable in this patient population.